Loading report…
← nittim
No deterministic issues found — not a clean bill of health. 14 dimensions remain unaudited. Run Audit for the verdict.
65 of 92 files scanned (70%). Nothing was cut short by a limit — the rest is mostly images, generated output, and other non-source content this audit doesn't read.
Two scanners read 65 of 92 files: one for committed credentials, one for known vulnerabilities in your dependencies. Neither found anything. That is not a clean bill of health. These two checks cover a narrow slice of what decides whether software is ready to ship. All 14 dimensions — architecture, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk and the rest — are unexamined here. Deep Verification is the tier that issues a verdict. This scan does not.
tests/test_advisory.py:48, :52, :100, :104
:48 — encoded_good = "eyJ0eX…BHDg" — non-production path
:52 — encoded_bad = "eyJ0eX…JEE4" — non-production path
:100 — encoded_good = "eyJhbG…3OXg" — non-production path
:104 — encoded_bad = "eyJhbG…ZITU" — non-production path
tests/test_jwks_client.py:214, :317
:214 — token = "eyJ0eX…SIzA" — non-production path
:317 — token = "eyJ0eX…SIzA" — non-production path
tests/test_advisory.py:9, :17
:9 — priv_key_bytes = b"""-----B…---- — non-production path
:17 — ssh_priv_key_bytes = b"""-----B…---- — non-production path
Security, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk, 10 more: unaudited, not clean.
The free scan doesn't reason across these — unaudited, not safe. Opus 4.8 scores each, with evidence, impact, and a fix.
Scanned 65 of 92 files · jpadilla/pyjwt
Dependency manifests: 2 Python manifests read.
[](https://nittim.com/library/jpadilla/pyjwt)