Loading report…
← nittim
2 critical dependency vulnerabilities found. 11 more dimensions need Audit for the full picture.
84 of 130 files scanned (64%). Nothing was cut short by a limit — the rest is mostly images, generated output, and other non-source content this audit doesn't read.
Two scanners read 84 of 130 files: one for committed credentials, one for known vulnerabilities in your dependencies. They found 0 committed credentials on production paths and 2 high or critical vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies. These two checks cover a narrow slice of what decides whether software is ready to ship. All 14 dimensions — architecture, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk and the rest — are unexamined here. Deep AI is the tier that issues a verdict. This scan does not.
1.11.7 — GHSA-337x-4q8g-prc5, GHSA-3gh2-xw74-jmcw
Improper Input Validation in Django — HIGH
SQL injection in Django — HIGH
3.7.3 — GHSA-fx83-3ph3-9j2q, GHSA-gw84-84pc-xp82, PYSEC-2020-263
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in Django REST Framework — MODERATE
Cross-site Scripting in djangorestframework — LOW
A flaw was found in Django REST Framework versions before 3.12.0 and before 3.11.2. When using the browseable API viewer, Django REST Framework fails to properly escape certain strings that can come f — UNKNOWN
Security, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk, 10 more: unaudited, not clean.
The free scan doesn't reason across these — unaudited, not safe. Opus 4.8 scores each, with evidence, impact, and a fix.
Scanned 84 of 130 files · payatu/Tiredful-API
Dependency manifests: 1 Python manifest read.
[](https://nittim.com/library/payatu/Tiredful-API)