Loading report…
← nittim
These are facts from deterministic scanners, not opinion — 4 high/critical dependency vulnerabilities. The full picture — architecture, AI-generated-code risk, privacy, and 11 more dimensions — needs Audit.
These are facts found by automatic checks, not opinions — 4 serious security bugs in the ready-made packages your project uses. The full picture — how your code is built, AI-generated-code risk, privacy, and 11 more areas — needs Audit.
4 critical dependency vulnerabilities found. 11 more dimensions need Audit for the full picture.
190 of 231 files scanned (82%). Nothing was cut short by a limit — the rest is mostly images, generated output, and other non-source content this audit doesn't read.
Two scanners read 190 of 231 files: one for committed credentials, one for known vulnerabilities in your dependencies. They found 0 committed credentials on production paths and 4 high or critical vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies. These two checks cover a narrow slice of what decides whether software is ready to ship. All 14 dimensions — architecture, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk and the rest — are unexamined here. Deep AI is the tier that issues a verdict. This scan does not.
0.1.7 — GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2, GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j, GHSA-rhx6-c78j-4q9w
path-to-regexp vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service via multiple route parameters — HIGH
path-to-regexp outputs backtracking regular expressions — HIGH
path-to-regexp contains a ReDoS — HIGH
0.7.0 — GHSA-5v2h-r2cx-5xgj, GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked — devDependency
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked — devDependency
6.11.0 — GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p, GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883
qs's arrayLimit bypass in its bracket notation allows DoS via memory exhaustion — MODERATE
qs's arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service — LOW
Security logic, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk and 10 more — unaudited, not clean.Security logic, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk and 10 more — not checked yet, which is different from safe.Security, privacy, reliability, AI-generated-code risk, 10 more: unaudited, not clean.
The free scan reasons across none of these. Absence of findings is reported as unaudited, not safe. Opus 4.8 reads the code semantically and scores every one — with evidence, business impact, and a fix per finding.
The free scan doesn't look at any of these. If nothing is flagged here, that means it wasn't checked — not that it's safe. Opus 4.8 (the AI model behind the audit) reads and understands your code and scores every one of these — with evidence, the real-world impact, and a fix for each finding.
The free scan doesn't reason across these — unaudited, not safe. Opus 4.8 scores each, with evidence, impact, and a fix.
Scanned 190 of 231 files · expressjs/express
Dependency manifests: 1 package root found, 1 scanned.
[](https://nittim.com)