a public repository, read by nittim
Is medusajs/medusa production ready?
What nittim read in this repository, and what it found. Public repository, public reading — sourced from its own code and dependency manifests, nothing else.
A commerce backend: carts, orders, payments, plugins.
TypeScript · 35.9k stars
No verdict. The rule-based check reports hard evidence, or reports that it found none. Neither is a judgment on whether this code is safe to ship.
What was read — rule-based scan
Rule-based checks run on nittim's servers — a secret scanner and a dependency check, no model in the path. The code reached those two and stopped there.
Read 465 of 23852 eligible files. Commit b2eaae1. 2026-08-21.
What the scanners found
- Committed secrets on production paths
- 0
- Vulnerable runtime dependencies
- 8
axios (GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh, GHSA-3g43-6gmg-66jw), form-data (GHSA-hmw2-7cc7-3qxx), next-mdx-remote (GHSA-g4xw-jxrg-5f6m), postcss (GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q, GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849)
Run it yourself
Scan any public repository in seconds — no sign-in, no card. Audit it to have a model read the code. Loop the report into your assistant to get the fixes applied and re-checked.
Scan your own repoQuestions
- What did nittim read in medusajs/medusa?
- nittim read 465 of 23852 eligible files in medusajs/medusa. The reading ran on August 21, 2026. It was taken at commit b2eaae1.
- Did nittim find committed secrets or vulnerable dependencies in medusajs/medusa?
- The rule-based scan found 0 committed secrets and 8 vulnerable dependencies in medusajs/medusa. Affected: axios (GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh, GHSA-3g43-6gmg-66jw), form-data (GHSA-hmw2-7cc7-3qxx), next-mdx-remote (GHSA-g4xw-jxrg-5f6m), postcss (GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q, GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849).
- Is medusajs/medusa production ready?
- A free scan is not a verdict. A full audit gives one.
More like this
More TypeScript repositories →
Add the badge to your README
[](https://nittim.com/library/medusajs/medusa)