a public repository, read by nittim
charlax/professional-programming security audit
What nittim read in this repository, and what it found. Public repository, public reading — sourced from its own code and dependency manifests, nothing else.
A collection of learning resources for curious software engineers
Python · 51.7k stars · last push October 27, 2026
charlax/professional-programming is a Python repository that collects learning resources for software engineers. The repository contains educational materials and references organized for developers seeking to expand their knowledge.
Nittim scanned 28 files in the repository and read all of them. The scan found no deterministic findings, no committed credentials on production paths, and no vulnerable runtime dependencies.
Developers can rescan charlax/professional-programming after making changes to verify the results remain consistent. Running an audit would provide additional detail about any dependencies and their security status.
Written from nittim's own scan on November 1, 2026; rescanned when the repository changes.
No verdict. The rule-based check reports hard evidence, or reports that it found none. Neither is a judgment on whether this code is safe to ship.
What was read — rule-based scan
Rule-based checks run on nittim's servers — a secret scanner and a dependency check, no model in the path. The code reached those two and stopped there.
Read 28 of 28 eligible files. Commit 2e9e51c. 2026-11-01.
What the scanners found
- Committed secrets on production paths
- 0
- Vulnerable runtime dependencies
- 0
Run it yourself
Scan any public repository in seconds — no sign-in, no card. Audit it to have a model read the code. Loop the report into your assistant to get the fixes applied and re-checked.
Scan your own repoQuestions
- What did nittim read in charlax/professional-programming?
- nittim read 28 of 28 eligible files in charlax/professional-programming. The reading ran on November 1, 2026. It was taken at commit 2e9e51c.
- Did nittim find committed secrets or vulnerable dependencies in charlax/professional-programming?
- The rule-based scan found 0 committed secrets and 0 vulnerable dependencies in charlax/professional-programming. No vulnerable dependency was found by the rule-based scan. A scan that finds nothing has found nothing; it is not a guarantee.
- Is charlax/professional-programming production ready?
- A free scan is not a verdict. A full audit gives one.
More like this
Add the badge to your README
[](https://nittim.com/library/charlax/professional-programming)